Insane PARK

Insane PARK (b. 1980) is an artist who has explored the interrelationship between vision and perception through a sustained interest in media and images. By analyzing and dismantling conventional images repeatedly exposed through the media, PARK seeks to reveal the essence and limitations of human cognition and thought as mediated by sight. Beginning with early cable paintings that reconstructed portraits through cable materials, PARK’s practice has expanded to neon works that examine the relationship between text and image. Approaching PARK’s work with an editorial attitude, PARK reconstructs subtle clues from everyday life to present moments and facts that we have seen yet overlooked. PARK’s works, produced from an excess of supplied images, question the very form of the medium and can be described as post-production, since they recycle existing art rather than generate something entirely new. Instead of positioning himself as a creator, PARK moves through the terrain of contemporary art as a director, remixing or programming existing references in the manner of a DJ.
Artworks
- Post Vandalism, 2022, Single-channel video, color, sound, 4 min. 17 sec., Ed. 1/6, A.P. 2
Post Vandalism is a video work that virtually stages the interior and exterior of the Seoul Museum of Art (SEMA) Nam-Seoul Annex as if they were covered in red spray-paint graffiti, visualizing resistance against institutional art and structures of power. The artist installs a fictional banner reading “Insanepark solo exhibition vandalism” and transforms “artist fee” into “artist pee,” exposing contradictions within the art system through acts of linguistic subversion. Slogans such as “All art is propaganda” and “Burn down the museum” violently articulate the frustration and distrust contemporary artists feel toward institutional authority, questioning both the social function and the structural limits of art. Set against the backdrop of an illegally occupied museum, the work examines how gestures of resistance can emerge from within the very system they critique. Insane PARK’s practice focuses on the immateriality and circulation inherent to digital art. The artist’s videos exist not as collectible objects but as files that can be infinitely replicated and transmitted. This immaterial condition frees the artwork from traditional notions of ownership, transforming circulation itself into a condition of art. By foregrounding the instantaneous reproduction and consumption of digital images, Insane PARK reveals how institutional authority and systems of artistic value are dismantled in the process. The work ultimately poses a fundamental question: what does it mean for an artwork to exist and circulate in the digital age? - Burning Down the Museum, 2022, Single-channel video, 55 sec., Ed. 1/6, A.P. 2
Burning Down the Museum is a video work that, like the Post Vandalism series, addresses resistance against institutional art systems and dominant ideologies. The video virtually stages the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art (MMCA) Seoul engulfed in flames, presented as if it were being livestreamed on Instagram. Although it appears to broadcast a real-time incident, the scene is in fact a fabricated image created through digital technology and motion graphics. By transmitting the extreme event of fire or arson through the contemporary medium of Instagram Live, the work symbolically dismantles the stability and authority of institutional art, exposing the contradictions and tensions concealed within its structure. - Post Vandalism (BACC), 2024, Single-channel video, 4 min. 48 sec., Ed. 1/6, A.P. 2
In 2024, the artist participated in a residency program at Baan Noorg Collaborative Arts & Culture in Thailand, where they developed new work based on the methodology of Post Vandalism. Using locally common construction materials such as bamboo and white fabric, the artist created a banner installation that invited local participants to fill the white cloth with various messages and images using spray paint. Through this process, vandalism functioned as a means to dismantle social norms rooted in authority and hierarchy. This participatory project served as a form of resistance against social hierarchies and demonstrated how acts of vandalism can become a medium for communication and collective expression. Alongside the banner installation, the artist presented the video Post Vandalism (BACC) (2024), which featured a fabricated scene of the Bangkok Art and Culture Centre (BACC), one of Thailand’s major contemporary art museums, being vandalized. The work symbolically deconstructed the institutional authority and hierarchy embedded within the museum. Throughout the residency, the artist engaged in continuous dialogue with local participants about Thailand’s political situation, incorporating their perspectives and lived experiences into the video. The resulting work reflects a critical view of both Thai social issues and the structures of the art institution, mirroring the region’s political and social realities. - Disposable Mask for Amateur Vandals INSTRUCTION MANUAL, 2025, Digital print, Dimensions variable

- Disposable Mask for Amateur Vandals INSTRUCTION MANUAL, 2025, Digital print on paper, framed, 100 × 75 cm

- Disposable Mask for Amateur Vandals, 2025, Print on plastic bag, framed, 75 × 75 cm

- Amateur Vandal Kit, 2025, Spray can, printed paper (manual & packaging), USB, plastic bag, 21 × 29.7 × 7 cm

- Amateur Vandal Kit, 2025, UV print on stainless steel, 150 × 120 cm

- YES, SYSTEM, 2024, Neon, 40 × 37 cm

- Not Valid Outside the Museum, 2025, UV print on stainless steel, 30 × 30 cm

- Burning Down the Galleries, 2025, Steel frame, approx. 46,000 matches, 3-channel video, 4 min. 56 sec., 160 × 230 × 230 cm

- Burning Down, 2025, UV print on stainless steel, 30 × 25 cm

Artist Responses
Above all, stable data management must be prioritized. The files should be backed up in formats that remain compatible over the long term, and the storage media should be replaced periodically. As the kit functions as a physical object that forms part of the work, it is equally important to preserve the package and its enclosed items. In other words, both the digital data and the analog object must be maintained in parallel.What do you consider the essential element that must be sustained, even if the medium changes?The essence of this work lies in reproducing the image and symbolism of destruction without enacting actual destruction. Therefore, even if the video format changes or the materiality of the objects shifts, the context and structure in which the act of vandalism is simulated and manifested within the exhibition space must be sustained.Does the work depend on specific technical forms or hardware?The work can be realized on standard, widely available equipment such as LED monitors. Certain versions have also been presented through older devices, such as the combination of CRT monitors and DivX players, which relates to the aesthetic intention of the work. However, the piece is not dependent on any specific hardware, and alternative equipment may be used for installation in different exhibition environments.What are the most important environmental conditions for installation (such as space, lighting, or sound)?The installation requires an environment where the screen can be clearly visible; LED monitors function well under standard exhibition lighting. In the case of CRT installations, it is important to emphasize the distinctive texture of the screen and the material presence of the playback device. Sound plays a central role in some videos, while in others it takes the form of near white noise. The weight of sound thus varies from piece to piece, and in this exhibition the monitor’s built-in output is sufficient without additional audio equipment. However, the significance of sound may shift depending on the scale of the space and the devices used. It is also essential that the kit and objects are arranged so that they are perceived in direct relation to the videos.To what extent can the work be reinstalled in the future without the direct involvement of the artist?If installed according to the exhibition manual, the work can be reinstalled without the artist’s direct involvement. However, in cases where specific equipment such as CRT monitors carries an aesthetic context beyond its function as a playback device, it is preferable to use equipment or alternatives that remain as close as possible to the artist’s original intent.Can the current form of the work be maintained in the future?Certain media such as USB drives, CRT monitors, or DivX players may no longer be produced over time. In such cases, transferring the same file to another storage medium (such as SSDs or cloud systems) does not compromise the identity of the work. Since the essence of the piece lies in the structure of simulating vandalism through video and the accompanying kit, both storage media and playback devices can be suitably substituted.If specific equipment or components fail, can they be replaced?Replacement is possible. A USB can be substituted with another storage medium, and if a CRT or DivX player fails, the installation can be adapted using LED monitors and standard players. What matters is not the preservation of the original hardware itself, but ensuring that the physical qualities of the playback devices are considered so that the intent of the work is maintained.Are there any particular points you would like to emphasize or considerations to note regarding the preservation of the work?I do not believe that digital media will endure indefinitely. Although often considered easier to preserve than physical data, digital files are frequently lost due to format errors, hardware obsolescence, or unforeseen physical factors. In some cases, analog media have proven more resilient. For this reason, the preservation of this work should not rely solely on digital storage; the kit and objects as physical components must also be maintained in order to sustain the overall context of the piece.
